Kate Elliott ([info]kateelliott) wrote,

Agents, Publishers, Rejection, Aspiring Writers

The ever-fabulous Justine Larbalestier writes a post on Agents and Rejection that is well worth reading.

Go on. You know you want to. I'll wait until you're back.

For those of you waiting around for the ones who went to read that blog post, I wanted to mention that I purchased a new paddle today. Actually, I ordered it about 6 weeks ago from Mana Blades, and today the man who makes them met me in a parking lot and he handed me the blade and I handed him the check and we were both very happy. Not only do I like buying local, but I love buying straight from the master craftsman who did the work, and who is rightly proud of the work he did (and he did; he bragged on that blade--the one he made for me--when he handed it over, not in a unseemly way but in the way you brag on your kids). It's the X1, by the way, but for some reason I can't get a photo of that one to come up. You'll have to use your imagination.

Okay. The rest of you are back, yeah?


As you know, there are many reasons novels get rejected by agents for representation, much less publishers for publication.

A well written book might be too dark (or too add-your-adjective-here), in a way that isn't trendy. It might be too focused, code word for being a story told in a way that is unlikely to appeal to a broad cross section of readers (such a book may still find a home at one of the fine small presses we're so fortunate to have in the publishing world). It may be controversial in a way that isn't sexy (i.e. salable). Racism or sexism, or the simple conflation of privilege and access, may be paying a role in what gets seen and/or determined to be publishable. And so on. All these things are true, and sometimes they are true all at once.

But let me digress to paddling again.

Last year one of our coaches explained to the entire group, "when I call out 'reach!' or 'watch your timing' or 'dig deeper,' don't assume I'm talking to one of the other paddlers in your crew. Assume I'm talking to you."

If you have a novel or story rejected, it may well be because of a factor that is to a greater or lesser degree outside of your control. But if you, as a writer, approach your writing only from that perspective, you're pushing yourself into a corner.

What you can control is your own writing and your ability to revise, clarify, improve, rewrite, and write new and better things.

The truth is that many (maybe even most) rejected stories and novels are rejected because they're not good enough.

Look, I've been there. I've raged and gnashed my teeth and felt stymied and frustrated and upset and weepy, and I may well be there again--there is no surety in this business, and one who is up today may be down tomorrow regardless of the quality of the work. And, yes, I have my moments when I look at some utter piece of tripe getting buzz and sales and tear out my hair wondering why my painstakingly crafted and grown from the heart piece of narrative is being ignored. I would be inhuman if I did not have those feelings. You would be inhuman if you did not have them.

That craftsman I bought my blade from today mentioned that a couple of the men from Manu (O Ke Kai, the canoe club I paddle with) had just ordered blades. He doesn't get orders for what are, after all, expensive pieces of workmanship by making something that isn't first rate.

All you can control is your own stroke and your own rhythm. And I tell you, I do not want to paddle with a person who is sure that the canoe does not have glide or is not going fast enough because everyone else is doing something wrong but not, oh not, them. Maybe they are perfect, but that attitude doesn't help the crew improve or the boat to go faster.

So if you get rejected, absolutely go ahead and get pissed off, cry, gnash your teeth. Writing is a deeply personal act. Be invested in your work. I'm invested in mine. I care about it deeply, passionately, fully.

But out in that canoe, with the wind in your face and the swells getting in the way of your rhythm, you've got to assume that you're not reaching long enough, you're not digging deep enough, you're off on your timing.

That's not a bad thing. It's the way you get better.
Tags: paddling, writing, writing as career

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 13 comments

[info]karenmiller

April 6 2009, 23:18:55 UTC 3 years ago

You rock with a rockiness that defines rock in all the best ways.

[info]kateelliott

April 6 2009, 23:30:14 UTC 3 years ago

You mean I'm inert?

[info]karenmiller

April 6 2009, 23:39:08 UTC 3 years ago

Doofus. *g*

You are solid through and through, comprised of 100% ancient wisdoms passed down to you through the ages by a strange alchemy.

[info]miintikwa

April 6 2009, 23:42:52 UTC 3 years ago

This is beautiful, and is so what I needed to hear as I'm stinging from my second (short story) rejection in as many tries.

Someday I will get there.

[info]london_setterby

April 6 2009, 23:48:26 UTC 3 years ago

Yay! Thank you for this post. I'm getting ready to send my first novel out to agents this summer. But now I think, before I start working on my "Agents to Query" spreadsheet, I should memorize your post. :) Or at least internalize the sentiment. It's a good sentiment.
Thank you. :)

[info]sylvia_rachel

April 7 2009, 00:11:07 UTC 3 years ago

Thanks for linking to that, as it might have taken me a day or two to get to it otherwise. I must say that although I too would prefer to get an auto-acknowledgement of receipt for e-mail queries just so I know they've arrived, most of the agent-directed vitriol JL discusses I (as an unpubbed writer) also found jaw-droppingly uncalled-for. Do I want an agent? Heck yeah. Do I want an agent who spends more time reading queries and slush than working on behalf of her/his clients? Heck no.

And for the rest, all so true.

Since I don't paddle, I would draw an analogy to choral singing (or any kind of ensemble performance, really). I've sung in a lot of choirs -- very good ones and pretty terrible ones and everything in between. I have been in choirs with people who, when the conductor looked right at their section and said "Don't talk when I'm talking" or "That's an A natural in bar seventeen" or "You need to have this by memory by Friday" or "The blend needs to be better," were convinced the instruction or admonition applied to everybody else. Their participation was very often not helpful. Some of these people had lovely voices ... but that's not all you need. You need to watch the conductor, and learn the notes and the markings, and work on the tricky bits at home, and listen to the people around you and work on the blend. And when your section screws up in some way -- when a cue is missed or a chord is out of tune or an interval is wrong or a voice is sticking out -- everyone has to take responsibility and work on getting it right next time. If everyone can do that fairly consistently, the whole group, qua group, will keep getting better. If instead everyone blames his or her neighbour for every problem that comes up, then no amount of rehearsal is going to make any difference.

We all like hearing from people who love our writing (or our singing, or our paddling, or our knitting) and think we are wonderful. It's so much harder to hear from those who point out all the ways it could be better -- but so much more helpful and empowering, too.

[info]joncwriter

April 7 2009, 00:58:29 UTC 3 years ago

Very well put!

One thing my wife reminds me constantly about my writing is something to the effect of "if you're writing for yourself, that's good, but don't expect it to sell." Meaning I might have written something I think is brilliant, but it doesn't mean anything if no one else gets it or if everyone else thinks it's crap. Harsh words, but it makes complete sense, and probably some of the best agent-type advice I've gotten yet. ;)

[info]triciasullivan

April 7 2009, 05:14:59 UTC 3 years ago

I love the paddling story. And you're right--it's human nature to let that instruction roll off, to think 'he doesn't mean me.' But writing's like anything else: you get out of it what you put into it. It's always worth it to dig deeper, praise or no praise.

Somewhat laterally, your paddling metaphor has brought to mind a Fellini poster I used to have, don't know what film it was from. It was a photograph of a gray-haired man rowing a boat at sea, and in the bow of the boat is a rhinocerous. I wish I still had it.

[info]mizkit

April 7 2009, 06:59:13 UTC 3 years ago

<3

[info]bloodatmidnight

April 7 2009, 10:07:10 UTC 3 years ago

I'm going to remember this post. I know I'm going to remember it for a good long while. It warmed my heart, and I can see the memory of it doing so years from now when I just might need to remember your wise words.
I'm not nearly at that stage yet, but if I ever get to be, I will remember that I might not be reaching or digging and that I just might be off, no matter how certain I am that I'm not.

[info]la_marquise_de_

April 7 2009, 10:32:42 UTC 3 years ago

I am that mythical beast, the writer who sold without an agent. Agents hate me: they continue to hate me. And their reasons are sound, too. I was lucky enough to find an editor who was willing to take a chance on me. But I am still looking out for an agent, because they know the business way better than I ever can. And I'm working on making myself agentable.

[info]msagara

April 7 2009, 21:10:55 UTC 3 years ago

Another writer many years ago once said to me "the cover for your first book was horrible, and the book died -- don't you feel bitter about that?" Her book -- which I thought brilliant -- had, as so many books, brilliant or no, failed to perform up to expectations, whatever those might have been. She wasn't happy about this -- and this, as Kate said above, is entirely human; it's normal.

But I said, "Would it change anything? Would being bitter help me at all?" Which caused a long silence. "The only thing I have control of in this process -- besides maybe initial submission -- is the writing. I can't change the past. I can't change what's been done. I can't personally go out and bump up sales of that first book in any meaningful way now.

"I can continue write. Nothing comes between me and the book when I'm writing it. I can try to get better. I can try to be clearer, to find a way to make my stories stronger. But that's all I control. The words. The writing. Although if being bitter made a positive difference, I'd try that, too."

[info]beth_heather

April 9 2009, 00:19:12 UTC 3 years ago

I love what you wrote. It's so true.
Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Facebook Twitter More login options
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…